win: merge win::pending_updates and win::flags
These two flags are intended for subtly different things. I can probably justify the distinction, but it's definitely difficult to explain. And there is no obvious benefits to keep them separate. Signed-off-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
23
src/picom.c
23
src/picom.c
@@ -1309,12 +1309,6 @@ static void handle_new_windows(session_t *ps) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void refresh_windows(session_t *ps) {
|
||||
win_stack_foreach_managed_safe(w, &ps->window_stack) {
|
||||
win_process_updates(ps, w);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void refresh_stale_images(session_t *ps) {
|
||||
win_stack_foreach_managed(w, &ps->window_stack) {
|
||||
win_process_flags(ps, w);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1351,7 +1345,13 @@ static void handle_pending_updates(EV_P_ struct session *ps) {
|
||||
// Call fill_win on new windows
|
||||
handle_new_windows(ps);
|
||||
|
||||
// Process window updates
|
||||
// Handle screen changes
|
||||
// This HAS TO be called before refresh_windows, as handle_root_flags
|
||||
// could call configure_root, which will release images and mark them
|
||||
// stale.
|
||||
handle_root_flags(ps);
|
||||
|
||||
// Process window flags
|
||||
refresh_windows(ps);
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -1363,15 +1363,6 @@ static void handle_pending_updates(EV_P_ struct session *ps) {
|
||||
free(r);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Handle screen changes
|
||||
// This HAS TO be called before refresh_stale_images, as handle_root_flags
|
||||
// could call configure_root, which will release images and mark them
|
||||
// stale.
|
||||
handle_root_flags(ps);
|
||||
|
||||
// Refresh pixmaps and shadows
|
||||
refresh_stale_images(ps);
|
||||
|
||||
e = xcb_request_check(ps->c, xcb_ungrab_server_checked(ps->c));
|
||||
if (e) {
|
||||
log_fatal_x_error(e, "failed to ungrab x server");
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user